Skip to content
StudyDex
Economics & Personal Finance

Which statement describes a key effect of technology?

Quick answer

"Technology creates more sources of information." This is the correct choice: technology multiplies the channels and volume of information available to consumers, rather than reducing sources or automatically guaranteeing that the information is accurate or credible.

The answer

The statement that describes a key effect of technology is: "Technology creates more sources of information."

Digital tools — websites, apps, social media, search engines, reviews, and streaming — have dramatically increased the number of channels through which people receive information. For a consumer making choices, this means far more product reviews, price comparisons, and expert opinions are available than in the pre-internet era. The core effect is an expansion of information sources.

Why the other options are wrong

Typical distractors on this item claim the opposite or overstate technology's benefits:

  • "Technology reduces the number of information sources." This is false. Technology lowers the cost of publishing and distributing information, so the number of sources grows, not shrinks. Anyone can create a blog, post a review, or launch a channel.
  • "Technology makes all information reliable/credible." This is false and a common trap. More sources does not mean more accurate sources. Technology spreads misinformation as easily as facts; it does not verify credibility for you.
  • "Technology guarantees consumers make better choices." Also false. More information can help decisions, but only if the consumer evaluates it critically. Without media-literacy skills, extra information can overwhelm or mislead.

So among the choices, only the statement about creating more sources correctly captures technology's effect.

The bigger picture: more sources means you must evaluate credibility

The depth these quiz answers usually miss is why this matters for consumer decisions. Because technology multiplies sources, the burden shifts to the consumer to judge which sources are trustworthy. This is the heart of media literacy. A smart consumer evaluates each source by asking:

  • Authority — Who created it, and are they qualified or a recognized expert?
  • Accuracy — Can the claims be verified against other reputable sources?
  • Purpose/bias — Is the source trying to inform, or to sell or persuade? Sponsored reviews and ads have a motive.
  • Currency — Is the information current, or outdated?
  • Evidence — Does it cite data and sources, or just make assertions?

More sources is a double-edged effect: it empowers consumers with comparison and choice, but it also exposes them to advertising, fake reviews, and misinformation. The economic takeaway is that information technology reduces search costs and widens choice, yet it raises the value of the skill of evaluating credibility. A consumer who can filter reliable sources from unreliable ones turns the flood of information into genuinely better purchasing decisions; one who cannot may be misled by whichever source shouts loudest.

Practice question

Which statement describes a key effect of technology?

Frequently asked

How does technology affect consumer choices?

Technology gives consumers far more information, such as reviews, price comparisons, and expert opinions, which can lead to better-informed choices. However, the benefit only materializes if consumers critically evaluate sources, since the same technology also spreads advertising and misinformation.

Does technology make information more or less reliable?

Neither automatically. Technology increases the quantity of information but does not verify its accuracy. It spreads reliable and unreliable content alike, so reliability depends on the source and on the consumer's ability to judge credibility.

How do you evaluate whether an information source is credible?

Check the author's authority and expertise, verify accuracy against other reputable sources, identify the purpose or bias behind the content, confirm the information is current, and look for cited evidence. Sources that sell or persuade should be treated with extra caution.

What are the pros and cons of having more information sources?

The pros are greater choice, easy price and product comparison, and access to diverse expert opinions, which lower search costs. The cons are information overload, exposure to fake reviews and misinformation, and the added effort required to separate credible sources from unreliable ones.

Start freeLog in